VisitSG : Official Travel Guide

VisitSG : Official Travel Guide

Is Singapore really boring? VisitSG redesigned looks at how users can explore tourism offerings more intuitively while lending aid to the Singapore Tourism Board’s aim to showcase a vibrant array of activities and boost economic activity through tourism spending.

Is Singapore really boring? VisitSG redesigned looks at how users can explore tourism offerings more intuitively while lending aid to the Singapore Tourism Board’s aim to showcase a vibrant array of activities and boost economic activity through tourism spending.

Industry:

Tourism

Tourism

Public Service

Public Service

Tools:

Figma

Figma

Adobe Illustrator

Adobe Illustrator

Skillset:

UI/UX

UI/UX

User Research

User Research

Prototyping

Prototyping

Is Singapore (really) boring?

In 2018, Singapore was ranked one of the least exciting cities in the world by Time Out Magazine, prompting the Singapore Tourism Board (STB) to respond with a promotional video. However, many visitors still perceive the state as boring, only to be agreed with locals on the common complaint that there is nothing to do.


We hypothesize this is due to a lack of awareness in Singapore’s diverse offerings. With exploration largely facilitated by tourism marketing on social and travel platforms, lesser-known attractions pale in comparison to attractions more likely to engage or provide more commission.


Diagram 1: Popular attractions thrive from tourism marketing on intermediary travel booking platforms, while lesser-known attractions receive less traction due to SEO and commission-based listings

Diagram 1: Popular attractions thrive from tourism marketing on intermediary travel booking platforms, while lesser-known attractions receive less traction due to SEO and commission-based listings

Above: Online travel agencies with revenue streams from 3rd party bookings

Above: Online travel agencies with
revenue streams from 3rd party bookings

Why do we see more potential for VisitSG?

Fast forward to 2023, STB announced plans to focus on redefining Singapore beyond popular attractions (such as Marina Bay Sands) and reconnect with visitors in their pursuit for 'Quality Tourism'. Amongst their approach is VisitSG, an App which strives to be a one stop platform to introduce visitors to Singapore.


Looking into its offerings, VisitSG lists unique attractions not found on online travel agencies (OTA) platforms. However, exploration is on a proximity basis and cannot be sorted.


We see more potential for the app to effectively promote Singapore's diverse offerings and begin to look towards understanding users for a user-centric approach.

VisitSG's Functions:

Showcases Singapore's events

Showcases Singapore's events

Lists attractions not found on OTA platforms

Lists attractions not found on OTA platforms

Feature articles and neighbourhood guides

Feature articles and neighbourhood guides

Lists travel tips and document essentials

Areas for improvements:

Attraction listings are unsorted

Above and Left: Image from VisitSingapore.com

Above: Images from VisitSingapore.com

Why do we see more potential for VisitSG?

Why VisitSG?


How do users want to explore attractions?

How do users want to explore attractions?

VisitSG as a unique proposition

VisitSG as a unique proposition


Re-designed Interfaces

Re-designed Interfaces


Was this successful?

Was this successful?

How do users want to explore attractions?

Given a wide range of attraction types, we scoped the user research to only museums given the limited time we had for the student project. This allows a more focused understanding of users albeit not completely representative of other attraction types.


Both patrons and non-patrons were interviewed on factors leading to their preferences, where the former was conducted at museums to solicit raw recollection and responses.

User Interviewees:

User Interviewees:

6

Foreign Visitors

Foreign Visitors

3 & 3

Patrons &
Non-Patrons

Patrons &
Non-Patrons

25 - 40

Age of Visitors

Diagram 2: User interviews questions employed with the main aim of understanding users' motivations.

Diagram 3: Key personas and journey maps based on user responses.


Note: The journey map assumes a linear process to book attractions and does not show how users may arrive at or leave the process at different stages. (e.g. coming across an attraction via Tiktok or word of mouth would catapult users to the deciding stage)

Above: Key personas and journey maps based on user responses.

Note: The journey map assumes a linear process to book attractions and does not show how users may arrive at or leave the process at different stages. (e.g. coming across an attraction via Tiktok or word of mouth would catapult users to the deciding stage)

What problem did we discover?

What problem

did we discover?

Visitors need an intuitive way to explore tourism offerings by topic of interest (e.g., culture, art), rather than activity type (e.g., tour, museum). This would allow them to discover lesser-known attractions and avoid being limited to only popular attractions or those that pay commissions to booking platforms.

“There is a huge junk of information online, it is alot to read”


-Mdm Haditi, Malaysian, travelling with family, 43yo

“There is a huge junk of information online, it is alot to read”


-Mdm Haditi, Malaysian, travelling with family, 43yo

“Why don’t you just summarise and make it more interesting.”


-Gabby, New Zealander, stop over, 25yo

“Why don’t you just summarise and make it more interesting.”


-Gabby, New Zealander, stop over, 25yo

“There is adrenaline in discovery new things about a city”


-Jackie, Australian, solo traveller, 36yo

“There is adrenaline in discovery new things about a city”


-Jackie, Australian, solo traveller, 36yo

Diagram 4: User pain points plotted on a prioritisation chart to assist in identifying critical issues to resolve

Diagram 4: User pain points plotted on a prioritisation chart to assist in identifying critical issues to resolve

VisitSG’s Goals as a unique proposition

Our target users:

  • New and returning visitors

  • Locals looking for attractions to visit

What VisitSG provides:

  • Content of all available attractions

  • Exploration by interest & navigation by activity

  • Entry booking and customer reviews

How this helps STB's goals:

  • Economic activity for all attractions

  • Improved branding as a destination of diverse offerings

  • User data on visitors’ interest for more targeted campaigns

Diagram 5: Feature analysis of competing platforms

VisitSG’s re-designed prototype

1

VisitSG opens to “Attractions” as the first primary navigation tab of a travel app, instead of featured articles.

VisitSG opens to “Attractions” as the first primary navigation tab of a travel app, instead of featured articles.

2

A spotlight banner and secondary navigation icons are introduced on top.


Icons are placed from left to right in decreasing priority as tourists want to prioritise popular attractions with a limited time in the country.

3

With national brand colours red and white, red was used sparingly to draw attention without adding unnecessary cognitive load to users.


Attractions are also displayed in a 2-by-2 grid for more efficient viewing.

Before

After

4

“Just For You” allow users to explore by interest. Each filter buttons changes to a darker stance upon tap, with a red “Apply” button as call-to-action.

5

Applicable attractions are listed in a mixed order to encourage cross-activity exploration.

Applicable attractions are listed in a mixed order to encourage cross-activity exploration.

6

Users can edit their interest by clicking on filter functions of “Interests” and “Requisites” (refers to accessibility and amenities need).

Users can edit their interest by clicking on filter functions of “Interests” and “Requisites” (refers to accessibility and amenities need).

7

“Search” allows users to search by text or navigate by activity type.

“Search” allows users to search by text or navigate by activity type.

Exploring by interest

Filter by travelling needs

Navigate by activity

Was this successful?

Was this successful?

Increase user satisfaction from exploring by interest

Majority of users found navigation by interest to be intuitive when exploring a new place. They also enjoyed the cross-activity exploration and tapped into listings which they have not been to before.

Actual economical impact to be determined

The unique proposition of this is to allow cross-activity exploration to discover attractions not found on OTAs. However, it is unclear how successful this motivates users to engage with them over returning to familiar attractions.

Lessons learnt

A need to understand users better

There are more personas to identify beyond who we interviewed. Besides solo travellers, young families and stopovers, business travellers and active retirees can have different pain points too. Ultimately, the interviewed sample should represent actual statistics.

Assumptions were made

The redesign suggests VisitSG can aid visitors in connecting with Singapore more intuitively. However this benches on assumptions, where all attractions are worthwhile to be visited and users are on a linear discovery journey.

A failed onboarding..

In my original prototype, we included an on-boarding process to get user interests and requisites. However this was proven futile during usability tests as most wanted to skip the process. If any, an onboarding will require an engaging narrative to pull users through.

Lessons Learnt

Liked what you read?

Reach out or let me know your thoughts below:

Liked what you read?

Reach out or let me know your thoughts below: